Explain How to Solve the Problem of EU Accession to the ECHR, Described in Decision CJEU 2/13.

The dissertation should be a little more up-to-date Results of the Reykyavik Summit should be incorporated – it is already set that the EU should acces the ECHR, so the problems and challanges of this sould be more outlined The „Recent interactions” are not so recent any more Boshphorus-case should be included (https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22fulltext%22:[%22Bosphorus%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-69564%22]})Bosphorus-clause: as long as the EU can ensure fundamental rights, the ECtHR accepts this, but if not, the ECHR should prevailCases along this clause can be listed here and consequences should be drawn Luxemburg and Strasbourg convergence and divergence should be implicated – asl already mentioned beforeA lot of cases invoke the practice of the other court – these can be analysed furtherElisabeth Sándor-Szalay has publications on this The question of the election of judges can also be addressed

Last Completed Projects